Blog

Writing and Videos to help you remember who your body is.



Begin your Somatic Journey

Subscribe and get the free BraveSpace Sensual Intelligence and be in the loop on what’s coming.

Start Now

The purpose of BraveSpace is to generate embodied spaces save enough to take the risk of being vulnerable.  What makes vulnerability a worthwhile goal?  This was the topic of last weekend’s BraveSpace Focus Group ‘Beta Test’.  (There’s another next Wednesday Nov 1st @6pm MT).  Here’s some of what came up in the discussion.

Vulnerability is the door to intimacy; to being real and present in relationship.  One participant in last week’s group shared an image of a hand reaching out inviting them to ‘the other side’.  What is the other side, I asked?  It is the authenticity which arises from and generates the possibility of oneness—with self, others, and the divine wholeness of all-that-is.  This tenderness is not available when we are busy protecting ourselves, positioning ourselves to take power-over, or projecting ourselves out of the present place and time.  In this way vulnerability is framed by the willingness to recognize all that we do not know, as well as the willingness to listen and to claim what we do know.  I find my own vulnerability these days in this second part—to be willing to stand for what I see, and willing to be humiliated if that’s what comes.  If I use ‘not knowing’ as an excuse to not be involved in life then that is guardedness, not vulnerability.  I do that sometimes.  I am vulnerable when I include myself in ‘us’, offering myself from a place of caring.  

Vulnerability is essential in the eros of creativity.  To allow my weakness, show my underbelly, be raw, messy, and willing to be humiliated are prerequisites to eros of all types, from sexuality to the pragmatic creativity of writing this post.  To imagine the possibility of something that I have not yet experienced requires me to be vulnerable.  I think this is because such imaginings do not come to pass unless we long for them.  Longings arise from depth beyond the desires of the egoic self.  In my longing I uncover something within that I cannot control, and I yield to it.  Vulnerability arises when I admit I cannot control of my longing—only how it is expressed.

I’m personally invested in and grateful for vulnerability because I wish to support a communal transition from a force-oriented paradigm of domination, where power is manufactured by privileging self over other, to an inquiry-oriented paradigm of co-creation, where power is revealed by being with what is and creating in tandem with ‘other’.  Co-creation is vulnerable.  The transition to co-creation is nothing new—it is in many ways the teaching of Jesus, Buddah, and so many others, yet we are at a key point in our evolution:  We have the ability and possible inclination to commit global pan-species suicide.  There are no ‘other’ people at a planetary scale.  Perhaps there has always been war, and yet it seems apparent that if anyone is to survive there cannot continue to be.  We are vulnerable either way, but one path consciously embraces it.

I want to honor that vulnerability is not always available to me.  There are conditions for vulnerability, and it is important to have boundaries that match the conditions present.  To find our own vulnerability, and to encourage it in others, we cannot just stand up and declare it.  Rather, vulnerability requires setting up conditions that make it safe enough to take conscious risks.  It is a process and navigation, and the principles of BraveSpace are my take on what’s required.

De-shaming:  We recognize our bodies as nature, both wild and civilized.  We recognize and hold our judgements lightly in order to openly witness ourselves and each other.  While we mindfully choose our actions, we release the need to control our experience, asking of our bodies and each other’s bodies what is being revealed through our perceptions.

This principle has three distinct yet interwoven faces:  The power, practice, and importance of witnessing, the perspective that the body is nature, and an opportunity to deconstruct judgement.  Shame is not only an emotion, but also an action:  I can feel shame in myself or shame others by projecting judgement onto them.  Shame and shaming constitute more than just a judgement of a behavior:  They devalue the person who has behaved ‘badly’, whether self or other.  Often the shaming process also involves the larger community, leveraging others to further shame an individual or group.  Shame thus relates personal and communal realities:  We are not just looking at an individual, but at the context of the individual in culture.  Let’s also honor shame as a fundamental human experience, recognizing that shame would not exist if it didn’t serve an essential purpose.  De-shaming examines these relationships, and we should be aware of the cyclical trap of additionally shaming ourselves for feeling ashamed or for holding judgements.  De-shaming is a form of inquiry, not an inquisition.

There is no body outside of nature.  Civilization can train and affect how people and bodies behave, but we remain natural and interconnected systems.  A behavior cannot exist without a person who behaved, and no person’s behavior has consequence outside of relationship with others.  Ecosystems have layers of scale:  We are living systems, participating in living systems, and we are made up of living systems.  Shame can exist within any and all layers of this framework.  To de-shame is to explore the role of a behavior in the physical and social ecosystem as though our behaviors grow on trees—recognizing them as something given by nature.  Our bodies often behave without our conscious intent, and in resonance across the various layers of scale.  I might look at a part of myself with shame because I have internalized a story I’ve received from others directly, or due to what I’ve internalized through structures of media or education.  My shame arises not just because some part of me isn’t what I desire, but due to a belief that if I were behaving ‘better’ then my relationship to others and the whole would be different.  Shame thus asks for my responsibility at my individual scale.  This is what’s right and important about shame:  Shame is a powerful motivator for pro-social behavior.

To witness is to be present with someone or something in its aliveness.  Witnessing draws us deeper into connection with whatever it is we are witnessing.  We can witness at all the social and ecological levels of scale.  I can witness a community within myself, see a part of myself in you, or recognize the divinity of the whole living earth by witnessing leaves ruffling in the wind.  To witness is to acknowledge what is being given by nature.  To fail to witness may be a refusal to acknowledge what is.  Sometimes you or I may lack the capacity to witness, yet failing to acknowledge something doesn’t shift its nature.  Witnessing is a form of love.  What goes unacknowledged will keep asking to be seen and loved.

The problematic aspect of shame is that a part of you or I, a part of society—a part of everything—becomes unlovable and dis-included when subject to shame.  What a shame that this part exists!  If judgement were always sound and consistent from all angles, to dis-include would be brilliantly effective.  Of course, it isn’t.  Shaming others can be an attempt to dis-acknowledge something in ourselves and the larger whole.  An ecological perspective tells us that there is no place outside of the whole.  Every waste in a natural system is composted and re-introduced.  There is no place called elsewhere to which we can effectively banish the behaviors and people we don’t like.  Prisons and executions do this only to the degree that we must sit with the weight of who we imprison and kill to take care of the collective.  It is a troublesome and discomforting task to do so.  Even when such measures are necessary for collective safety, to heal the collective more deeply we can still ask why any behavior arose in the frame of a larger systemic scale, and where it sits in the nature of our shared reality.  To kill the murderer is to kill, and to imprison the thief is to take their freedom from them against their will.  In witnessing behaviors and people, and in witnessing our own judgements, we may recognize we are the very ones we are judging.  Shame on us for judging!  We do well to include that part.

The opportunity in de-shaming is to find the way back to love.  We are given to do this not because it will necessarily fix anything or everything, but because it’s outside our minds’ power to judge or segregate correctly.  There is no one human who carries the moral authority of the whole, and yet each of us is also generated by this wholeness.  Nature pervades all the layers of scale.  In de-shaming we are given the opportunity to inquire into and witness our divinity, and to marvel at the mystery of what is revealed through us.   

One of the great existential questions is the nature of truth.  Does truth exist, and if so where do we find it?

Countless classical, modern, and postmodern thinkers have attempted this one, and I sense the most common result of the attempt is increased anxiety.  I grew up mildly Jewish and the son of academic parents.  I was indoctrinated both with the stories from the Torah, the religious text from which Jewish and Christian perspectives arise, and the many texts and precepts of modern science.  Science runs tests of our physical world to determine a viewpoint—it is ‘objective’ essentially because in science we observe and test our world as objects.  Science has been a hugely effective method for procuring seemingly impossible abilities such as flying around the world, or communicating these words to you through tiny electrical charges.  The religious texts, on the other hand, consider miracles directly.  Moses is said to have parted the sea not because he had next generation 5G technology, but because he was given a divine miracle.  I can’t begin to claim one of these methods or perspectives is more true than the other.  As a child I stood boldly for science.  As an adult I know that I know less than I think, and I’m sitting in awe and wonder regarding all the many miracles.

What I do know is that I can use my body as a reference point for engaging with living truth.  My body has become the spiritual text I interpret.  I study daily how to better listen to and through my heart.  My body is alive—a subject as well as an object—and seems to connect to both the world of miracles and the world of knowledge.  I recognize in my body an experience of truth.  This doesn’t mean, as you’ve heard me say before if you’ve been reading me for a while, that I believe everything I feel.  Rather, my body is a place I can hold subjective experiments.  I can notice all the sensations, emotions, and thoughts that come through me, and I can move.  I move my body and my awareness.  This process of movement and awareness defines somatics as a field, one I consider it to be an internal and subjective science.  It is also for me a profoundly spiritual experience—a direct conversation with the divine.  

When we come together in groups and conjoin the individual truths coming through our bodies together, something magical happens:  We generate fields of consciousness—of truth—that go beyond what we know or believe.  Moving and feeling together offers an incredible experience of connection.  For me it is prayer, scientific research, and a great party all in one.  It’s also a very vulnerable kind of state, where our traumas may surface, and our personalities are likely to melt a bit.  It’s a place where a tremendous amount of healing can happen, yet we can also get hurt.  Vulnerability is risky, and so it takes intention, responsibility, and skill to hold these spaces for ourselves and for each other.  It takes reverence for each person’s individual divinity.

I’m calling together the BraveSpace® Focus Group to create embodied spaces where we can lean into the truth of our bodies and take the risk of being vulnerable.  It’s geared toward facilitators of embodied spaces, from yoga, to dance, to particularly progressive boardrooms, with the recognition that we all facilitate ourselves in our bodies in concert with the aliveness all around us.  I have 10 principles that I believe will help us learn and entrain with one another.  The principles are pan-somatic, arising from the philosophical basis of somatics as a field.  They also include both spirit and eros in their scope, because we could not have living bodies without these miraculous forces.  Please take a look, spread the word to those who should know, and apply if you feel called.  The group is open to ten participants, and I believe it will fill quickly.

THE BRAVESPACE® FOCUS GROUP

This spring I sat in a meadow for a few days watching and listening to the birds and the bees.  As my personality struggled to just be in the flow of things, the bees seemed perfectly relaxed in their buzz.  While my mind rushed to fill the emptiness with chaotic thoughts, the birds clearly and sweetly brought melody to the void.  I watched from the level of my soul.  Here is life, I felt.

Eros isn’t what you think, nor what I think either.  The birds and bees teach me that eros cannot be thought; it is rather the life force being felt.  I have long wondered why people use the phrase ‘the birds and the bees’ as a reference to speaking with kids about sex.  Sitting in the meadow I got it:  The birds and the bees are wildly erotic because they are literally wildly alive.  It’s difficult to conceptualize and speak to such forces in any form other than poetry.  

The ‘birds and the bees’ comprise a delightful, short poem.  They reveal the constant folding and unfolding of the life force.  We are made of eros, motivated by eros, and there is no escape from eros.  To dance in it is as painful as it is beautiful because we think:  We think we can and must control it.  I think perhaps I can define and speak about it.  Yet, it took me three days of sitting with the birds and the bees before it was given to me to dance.  It took that long to be genuinely called out of my head and into the living song of the meadow, to move my body in its own poetry.  Apparently eros also cannot be rushed.

The dance of eros often has very little to do with sex, yet it is also the source point for sexuality.  I worry speaking about it here that I’m getting swept up in an obsession with sexuality.  I worry that you think this.  Perhaps I am, and yet it’s repeatedly called through me to consciously engage.  I find it important to acknowledge this often shamed, hidden, and enlivening force. This summer I had the privilege of teaching the “Go F—Yourself Workshop,” in which we explored sexual energy within our own bodies and movement.  It was delightfully simple, the most potent result being a genuine sharing of love for ourselves, together.  I taught another workshop, one of dancing together through contact improvisation naked, at The Field Festival in the Netherlands.  It was entitled “The Art of Innocence.”  We were like five year olds basking in a simple eros, but the experience was not particularly sexual.  A number of participants commented that it was life changing to experience this.

For better and worse my leadership often emerges from what longs to be healed in me.  I’ve  noted my own shame in speaking to erotic energy and imagery again and again.  It’s helpful to me just to speak to that, and I hope that my voice may open space for resonant healing (and play) in our collective field of consciousness.  I also hope that in conversations with my teenage son about the ‘birds and the bees’ I’m able to impart something alive, poetic, and free. 

I’ll be calling very soon for a focus group of facilitators—people who hold or are interested in holding conscious embodied spaces—who wish to dive into the principles of BraveSpace.  See the principles here, including Eros.

Philip Shepherd is the author of Radical Wholeness: The Embodied Present and the Ordinary Grace of Being. He’s coming to Boise to teach his Radical Wholeness workshop Sept 16th-17th 2023 at SomaWorks. We spent some time in this video talking about wholeness, trauma, somatics, and his workshop in particular. 

In one part of the interview Philip asked what might be different if leaders were considered the ‘heart’ rather than the ‘head’ of their organizations?  There’s so many such metaphors rooted in assumptions we carry about our bodies.  In this short video interview I had with him he speaks to how other cultures have taught him what’s possible and re-oriented his worldview.

If you can make the workshop with him I’d love to share his teaching with you in person!

Sign up at www.radicalwholeness.com.  Please email me too so I know you’re coming!

Over the past few months I’ve spent time with diverse groups of somatic facilitators—people who hold spaces centered on the body and consciousness.  These are unusual groups of people when compared to those I run into at the grocery store, bank, or even the yoga studio.  In these somatic groups I’ve witnessed a tangible ability to self-organize, to witness and express emotional responses in ways that preserve care, and a joyful sense of expressivity.  I feel confirmed in my belief that facilitation is not just something that happens in an intentional group, but something that happens in every interaction we have with ourselves, others, and the world.  Facilitation is a way of being and a spiritual path.  

I grew up in an academic household, received a graduate arts education, and taught in universities.  In this secular context I learned to suspend any spirituality or sexuality in my viewpoint.  I learned to keep my expressions sterile.  Yet, the more I have learned to trust and listen to my body, and the more I have similarly leaned into group dynamics, the more deeply I have come to know that life force is never sterile.  Life is inherently spiritual and inherently erotic.  Avoiding these aspects only creates separation and alienation, particularly from ourselves.

The purpose of sterilization is to generate safety and control.  There is plenty that’s right about this:  With various sterilization methods we can consciously and effectively prevent diseases and pregnancy.  I have chosen sterilization so that my wife and I do not have more children.  If sterilization becomes assumed, however, then life becomes dull:  The bread cannot rise, there are no more children, and life loses meaning.  Stripped of spirit, we are dispirited.  Stripped of eros, we are impotent.  We are already destined to die:  Safety cannot be the most important priority of life because when it is we lose the magic of actually being alive.

I link spiritual connection to eros because desire—of any sort—is a way I read the life force coming through me.  I can navigate and interact with my desire through intellect, but I cannot control my desire itself.  I read this as a direct connection to the divine; to that which is larger than my control.  This is a somatic experience:  I am breathed.  I am danced.  I am love.  I cannot manipulate the truth of my body away with my mind.  Please do not misread me here:  I am saying that eros is inherent in the body and in human dynamics, not that it should be given control over everything we do.  Similarly, spiritual connection gives way to a more dogmatic spiritualism if everything is believed once someone claims it as the work of divine spirit. 

I see in our culture today a longing for meaning and connection.  I see a need for spirit and eros.  These are experiences of the living body that have no substitute in the sterilized world of things.  A faster car and a bigger screen won’t do it.  So far as I can tell more likes on Instagram won’t either.  We need each other, and some well-regulated ways of being with each other.  Somatic facilitators are the leaders who can bring others into a living experience of their body’s divinity.  Rachel Rickards sold me on her group facilitator training—The Field—by stating on her website that facilitation is not something we do but rather something that we are.  I agree completely.  Facilitation is not about the logic, the words, or even the principles shared, but rather a way of being within ourselves and with each other.  That said, principles and practices are fantastically useful as a framework around which to develop ourselves and our ways of communing.  Constitutions are such frameworks.  Religious texts are such frameworks.  Each arises out of a particular time and context.  Today calls for frameworks to help us listen to and trust our bodies so that we can connect with each other and spirit.  That is what I am driven to do with the principles of BraveSpace®.

I often ask myself who I think I am to offer such a thing.  Certainly I’ve gotten it wrong at times.  With so many incredibly capable people in the world, what’s so important about my perspective?  There’s lots of ways I can justify; I do have a very unusual background and education.  Yet, the deepest truth is that in my search for meeting I simply can’t let this go.  As I sit here writing to you about eros, divinity, and meaning, sharing this work is my way of making love with the divine.  I ache with desire to contribute, and feel integrity in the work.

Here’s my revised principles of BraveSpace®.  I invite your reflections and discussion.  I will call soon for a group of people curious to apply these principles in their own lives and facilitation.  In the meantime I will be offering them at The Field Festival outside Amsterdam in August and at TRUSTLab, a part of Unison Festival in New Mexico in September.   

BraveSpace® is a way of being together that acknowledges the primacy of the body for navigating how we relate, generating an environment safe enough to take the risk of being vulnerable.  

Holding BraveSpace® together has fundamental principles:

  1. Somatic Research:  We notice the sensations, emotions, images, and movements that we can perceive in our bodies.  We collect this data without jumping to conclusions about its meaning or significance prematurely.  Simultaneously, we recognize the truth of the body cannot be manipulated away by our minds.
  2. De-shaming:  We recognize our bodies as nature, both wild and civilized.  We suspend judgement in order to openly witness ourselves and each other.  While we mindfully choose our actions, we release the need to control our experience, asking of our bodies and each other’s bodies what is being revealed through our perceptions.
  3. Trans-formation:  We recognize that our movements and personalities are comprised of patterns that take form in our bodies and behaviors, and that change in these patterns is often uncomfortable.  We are willing to change our form and invite discomfort in order to grow in alignment with purpose, truth, and community.  We simultaneously seek to avoid injury to self, other, and world.
  4. Improvisation:  We invite awe and wonder as we inhabit the mysterious gap between knowing and not knowing.  We allow truth to emerge through us and recognize power as the ability to be with what is.
  5. Response-ability:  We reposition ourselves in relation to others and the world in each moment seeking our consensual place of belonging.  If we become overwhelmed, frozen, or otherwise unable to respond we do our best to speak to it openly and honestly.  We do not attempt to control others’ actions in order to avoid shifting our own relationship to the external world, although we may share our perspectives and invite change.
  6. Heart-Centeredness:  We recognize our hearts as portals to spirit and communal consciousness, with the potential to guide us through the limitations of our minds and individual identities.  We embody qualities of unconditional love, healing presence, innate harmony, and compassion by calling our attention and energy back to our hearts and to the communal heart.
  7. Tensegrity:  We recognize tensional integrity as a systemic property of our physical bodies in space and also of the interpersonal and spiritual realms we inhabit together.  We value and hold the tension of opposites as a necessary and healthy aspect of consciousness, and as a key to improvisational emergence.
  8. Risk:  We recognize life as a place of inherent mortality and choose in BraveSpace the risk of intimacy with ourselves, each other, and the divine, knowing that none of us will complete our journey on this planet alive.  We embrace fear without being led by it.
  9. Eros:  We recognize our bodies are charged with a force of life that is inherently erotic and which manifests differently for each of us.  We celebrate our pleasure, vitality, and longing by meeting masculine and feminine dynamics within ourselves.  In BraveSpace we direct sexual energy that may wish to fixate physically on others into making love with spirit in its many forms.
  10. Interbeing:  We recognize that we are simultaneously individual and collectively conscious beings in concert with an animate world.  We attune to and contribute to communal fields of consciousness by noting our own values and preferences, voicing and moving them as they are given to us to share, and being willing to release them to impermanence.